For years now I have been screaming what most people in the South say about why the Southeastern Conference is the best in the nation when it comes to football: It is the best top-to-bottom from a competitive quality perspective. While there is no doubt that Alabama & Florida represent the pinnacle of NCAA football this year (along with a couple of Big XII - South teams), I have revised my opinion. Too many of its usually very strong teams did not show up in 2008.
Look at the below comparison to illustrate my feeling. Remember, the widely-held feeling was that the SEC was the best conference top-to-bottom.
ACC
- Boston College 9-3
- Georgia Tech 9-3
- Virginia Tech 8-4
- Florida State 8-4
- North Carolina 8-4
- Maryland 7-5
- Wake Forest 7-5
- Miami (FL) 7-5
- Clemson 7-5
- North Carolina State 6-6
- Virginia 5-7
- Duke 4-8
SEC
- Alabama 12-0
- Florida 11-1
- Georgia 9-3
- Mississippi 8-4
- LSU 7-5
- South Carolina 7-5
- Vanderbilt 6-6
- Kentucky 6-6
- Tennessee 5-7
- Arkansas 5-7
- Auburn 5-7
- Mississippi State 4-8
Again, clearly the Tide & Gators have shown themselves to be the highest of the high when it comes to coaching & execution. They deserve every accolade the receive. With many teams down (Tenn. & Auburn especially), though, the SEC is not the "deep" conference it has been in the past. Heck, only 6 teams are above 0.500 vs. 9 in the ACC.
Am I saying the ACC is a better football conference? No. What I am saying is that in 2008 the SEC looks more like what the Big 10+1 used to be; a two-team-conference. These "down" programs will return in time, but this year is not a banner one for the SEC.




